Take a look at the article in the link below.
http://in.news.yahoo.com/240/20090810/1301/twl-6751773.html
Now this is some seriously maddening stuff!! Go ahead and read the article above, and tell me if at some point you feel in your gut that something’s not quite right! I know I did. I felt at one level that even with the first example of the woman in her hotel room, there was something wrong. And no, please do not mistake this as merely a show of sympathy for the poor working woman! Hell no, how about a little show of faith in the drunk working man!!
It was an office party in the bar downstairs. A coworker with more ‘power’ than the woman called her and asked her to get outta bed and come enjoy the party. She felt threatened by it? Oh yeah, so the next time the guy in charge asks to you to come and chill with everybody else, that’s a threat? You know, I’m gonna look at this from a few angles. Say the guy was drunk and in the mood to fool around. So he called the woman and asked her to get down to the bar. She said she needed to sleep and hung up. Guy told himself, “Oh crap, guess I’ll look to the other chicks for a nightcap.” Or maybe something like, “That chick’s boring as hell! She oughtta let her hair down a lil’.” How about, “I think it makes sense if she came and mixed with everyone else. Good for the team.” Or, for the paranoid, “Goddamn that bitch!!! Here my thingy’s getting all steamed up, and she hangs up on me??? I’ll show her at work tomorrow!!!” Admittedly, there is a possibility that if that last option was a fact, AND it was followed up by some bullshit by the guy at work against the woman, then we’d have a problem. But basically, all that the woman really thought was that the guy was drunk, that he was someone with ‘definitely more power’ than her, and that he was calling her to the Bar at 2 a.m. to party with the rest. And she felt threatened by it.
Bloody hell, I’d be pissed off if some asshole called me at 2 a.m. and asked me to come party. That’s cuz I love my sleep. Now, I’m not a woman, so I don’t have to go through various indignities that they face as a consequence of their gender. Now I feel for them, I really do. Their lot has a tendency of being seriously crappy at times, too many times, really. But for God’s sake, do they have to be threatened by every drunk human with a penis?
It’s in the West, and it’s flowing into the East. No, no, sexual harassment very much exists here, and we don’t need the West to teach us that men here can be pigs too. But the idea of sexual harassment is evolving, and the stuff that’s accepted as unacceptable there is just automatically espoused here. Part of our modernization, perhaps? Just as we meekly accept Microsoft Word converting our ‘s’ to ‘z’ (yeah, I do it too), we’re beginning to accept concepts that might simply be considered a whole lot of bullshit when looked at objectively.
Look, ladies. The guys will think sexually of you whether you like it or not. And my God, that article practically says flirting is illegal!! What the hell is going on here?? We spend a pretty big part of our lives in the workplace, and we can’t even flirt?? If we do, people will start looking for a pattern? Sheesh, get a grip. Anybody got a problem with being made to feel pretty or attractive?? Stop a guy before he drools into your cleavage, sure, but if he thinks your haircut is looking great on you, and he seems to be checking you out, do you seriously have to be threatened by it?
I used to work in this activist place, once. We used to have these little office meetings to discuss issues. Once, the meeting was on sexual harassment at the workplace. We saw a video on the issue, and then began discussing the policy apparently existing in the office. There was no hard copy of the policy, and I don’t know what the fuck we were talking about. There was only one point that people (read: the women) wanted to be firm on; the fact that the policy existing in the office should protect women only. There was a (defunct) wing in that office which was to be working for the rights of the LGBT community. My ‘Boss’ jokingly said that we have LGBT people often working in the office, so what if a gay dude makes unwelcome advances on a male coworker? The women said that the male coworker wouldn’t be protected, which set me off, since I complained that harassment can certainly come from women as well. The entire group of females in the office started fighting with me, saying that women had faced decades of subjugation in society, so our office policy should protect only women, and why should we be any different? Because you’re trying to make a difference, you sloganeering hypocrites! One of the men in that group summed it up perfectly; he said that as long as there are more women than men in that office, the policy would never be gender neutral. I bloody laughed out loud!! Fucking activists!!! For over a week after that day, all the women looked at me like I’m Judas or something, and would whisper snide remarks behind my back. I felt harassed too for a while, but I couldn’t do a damn thing about it.
Sexual harassment is a real and terrible problem. But when labour lawyers start advising offices about non-fraternisation policies in the office, the need to lighten up a little seems to arise. Goddamn, in my current workplace, one of my earliest assignments was to edit a sexual harassment policy that some female had prepared before I joined. That crazy policy was so bad, that it banned any kind of physical contact between male and female colleagues in the office. If that shit were the norm, we wouldn’t even be able to shake hands!!! Luckily, my Boss trashed it and asked me to make a new policy from scratch.
That news article speaks of how the internet and new communication technologies have allowed for the smallest thing to be potentially ‘misconstrued’. That’s like a way of saying that if you’re a guy, and you have sent a winking emoticon, you’re potentially fucked (in the not happy way)!!! Really? Maybe we shouldn’t hyperanalyse every damn thing we receive as a message or email. Otherwise, what the hell am I supposed to believe when you consider the fact that my Boss’s WIFE sent me that link to that article with the message, “Bikram, for your information”???!!!!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
15 comments:
Friggin hilarious!
Even more that you take this so friggin seriously!!!
:D
But a commendable job! And for the record, I am not on the same side as all those female evangelists striving for justice towards women.
On a larger scale though, the struggle for equality for all those classes that have been at the wrong end of the stick in the past, is largely aimed at giving them an unfair advantage to compensate for the previous transgressions! I don't understand how that is supposed to be an act aimed at bringing equality!
Humans are self-centered...call me cynical but I do not think the human race is capable of self-less service...the fault lies in the fact that we are inherently short-sighted and incapable of thinking beyond ourselves.
We fail to understand situations from another's perspective. Sexual harassment, racial discrimination and what-not, lie rooted in this handicap...
Ah well...I'm ranting on now...been idle for too long I think!
Women essentially have two weapons, the “subjugation for years in society” song and their vaginas and they use both somewhat confusingly. Nevertheless, both these ‘Bhrammastras’ have aided women in steering the course of history and never has there been one great deed or great tragedy without a vagina or subjugation involved in it somewhere.
You see, I am no stranger to the suffering women folk have endured over the years and I am a strong advocate of the fact that woman are often a stronger breed than men and all I am saying is that it is a great insult to such strong women when a few of them readily remove their chaddis at the drop of a hat and the moment the purpose has been served start singing the “subjugation for years in society and sexual harassment” song like a bunch of canaries.
All I am saying is make up your mind ladies, strength of character and will power or the vagina and subjugation?
I completely agree with your point of view and while Rono you are right about how a few women are confused about their stance, hopefully you are not generalising...
As far as men are ocncerned I am happy that ypu all are a well informed lot who respect women but then again there are loads of them out there who dont.. women are paranoid when it comes to men because we have no choice but to be... We want to be forward... we want to ignore but do you know that if we ignore and things get out of hand, the first question that will be asked is 'why didnt you say anything earlier? obviously you were nejoying the attention!'...
you may think I am cribbing... but I know from years of seeing it al around me, that women walk on this narrow edge with people all around them ready to push them over.. and specially in India whether you like to believe it or not, it is always considered to be the women's fault.. 'her dressing sense' 'her walk' 'her talk' 'look at how she looks at him' etc etc... Paranoia is never justified but since I hit puberty all I was taught was to be alert bordering on paranoia...
I dont know if this is making sense but Rono and Da, we want to be equals.. we so badly do.. we are dying to break free.. and yet somehow there is an invisible force at home, at the market, at every goddamn place staring us into our face telling us just how unequal we really are...
PS: I do disagree with the women trying to make the policy exclusively for women :)
@zephyr
i don't think for a moment that you're cribbing. i understand and appreciate the post-pubescent conditioning that you and pretty much every other woman has received and continues to receive. i've heard of some pretty bad incidents myself. i'm glad you identified an important aspect to the concept of gender equality. sexuality and sexual depravity are unfortunately becoming more and more synonymous in society. what could be considered as playfulness, or even behaviour motivated by sexuality without, shall we say, 'bad' intentions, can so easily be labelled sexual harassment today. the hell with that, from that article it seems evident that just about anything can be considered harassment... and the non-fraternisation policy thing was pretty damn scary... read George Orwell's '1984' and you'll get the idea... as for the tendency of women being blamed, yes that's a really tough one to do away with... it's a matter of mindset.. basically, there's a 'boys will be boys' thing in everyone's subconcious mind, so men can be expected to be immature, lascivious idiots.. the girls on the other hand, cannot be free.. that bloody sucks, but i wonder if the flipside of that should be that almost any behaviour of a man can be construed as harassment.. you saw the article, even emoticons are suspect!!! on top of everything else, my Boss discussed it with me yesterday and wanted me to incorporate provisions in our sexual harassment policy reflecting the article... i was vehemently against it, and luckily at the end, he agreed to just insert a cautionary line in the policy... if i have to be worried about being considered a harasser because i think someone's hair looks nice, then we're all in big trouble!!!!
@Zephyr: I totally understand and I am saying that from personal experience.
No I am not generalising, on one hand I totally understand a woman's need to be treated equally vis-a-vis men and you know and I that it is happening, maybe at a snail's pace, but it is...all I have an objection with is it being misused. I got into a similar debate on FB the other day with a few people about how pro-woman penal provisions are used as tools of harassment against men. All she has to do is cry out in a crowded gathering and all hell breaks loose...get my drift?
I apologise about the choice of words in my first comment...
@Rono: But there are times (n this has happened with me) when we scream n cry out and no one comes... they stand around n watch... But I agree with the fact that a girl screams harassment and all hell breaks loose.. but then again why is it that soo many at the wrk place dont report harassment?
@Da: If a guy form my wrk sent me mail saying "I wud love to see u in taht dress' and I dont knw tht guy very well, i'd be pissed! Coz it is CREEPY!!
At my wrk place a guy i barely knw keeps mailing me hw he finds my smile sweet every other week, do i cal tht harassment? no.. i call tht not being subtle.. but if he sent me a mail saying 'U are looking hot today with a winky' i'd probably be sending a mail bk saying BACK OFF... there's a thin line between complimenting and being creepy.. read the article again... and by now every guy knws the difference... :)
N if he doesnt then ask him to consult one of his chic friends :)
@Zephyr: I wrote a long reply and accidentally deleted it..bummer, I know.
[fortunately for rono, i have a copy of the long reply he wrote and which got accidentally deleted.. here's Rono's reply to Zephyr]
"@Zephyr: I absolutely stand with you when you say that in the past you've screamed out for help and people have stood, watched and done nothing, welcome to our nation. Whether sexual harassment cases are reported or not or for that matter how many of them are reported and how many of them are concealed vary from situation to situation, I mean you may not have seen many a job termination based on sexual harassment, I have. A friend of mine got fired last year from work cause he had a hypersensitive colleague who didnt quite appreciate being given a pop-up card on her Birthday...!
A friend's driver once got into trouble in the streets..some woman he had never ever seen showed up from nowhere, shoved her hand in his pocket and started screaming out to people saying that he had taken her money away and she actually managed to gather a nice little group of people who beat the air out of him and took all his money and gave it to her...it was on the papers long back...!"
@Rono
I had a rather interesting conversation with Zephyr the other day about this subject. she, like most other women, feel strongly about this issue, rightfully i might add... I named this post "Another milestone in my path to Chauvinism", but i'm departing from a chauvisnistic view for a minute.. i'm sure zephyr will be miffed at your "welcome to our nation" attitude.. she has already had to deal with the 'this is delhi' part of it... such an attitude on some level reflects a tacit acceptance of behavior that ranges from annoying to vulgar to downright sociopathic... just lamenting on how its wrong doesn't take away from the fact that you have come to accept it as an 'inevitable' reality... i'm sure you will agree that in such matters, tangible change must necessarily be preceded by a change in attitude... if we don't already, then we should start knowing better, bro...
@Rono: I know women misuse the 'im being harassed' just like men misuse 'im physically superior' part... do i want to say women are saints? Absolutely not... my point has always been fight back and dont accept...
@Da: Thank you for that long talk... and I understood your point of view too.. so my perspective too has changed.. thanks!! :)
@Da & Zephyr: I never meant to be this blunt and I have already stated that I acknowledge Zephyr's stand totally on this issue and neither did I at all want to miff her...but I am amazed at the typically straight trajectory such debates follow, people take off from their respective view points and meander quite a bit and at the end everything comes and halts at 'tangible change' and 'change in attitude' and the works..hasnt this poetry been recited by one and all for years?
How many save for a handful would even think about this twice, its all worth a moment's passion..how many of us have actually done anything worthwhile without the given opportunity and circumstance?
@Zephyr: you're right...its the docile that get exploited. One has to kick back.
nobody reads my blog anymore wtf!
Post a Comment